The Pace of the Race

The Pace of the Race

If you haven’t been paying close attention to the artificial intelligence industry over the last few months, a lot has changed, and it is worth catching up.

The major AI companies all released significant new models this summer. Systems considered cutting-edge at the beginning of the year are now mid-tier. OpenAI launched its latest model family in July. Anthropic, which filed for an IPO in June, released what many consider the most capable AI system to date. Google and Meta pushed major updates as well. The cycle of new technology is accelerating, with each generation outperforming the last by wider margins.

The scale of investment is just as striking. Major tech companies have issued over $220 billion in bonds this year to fund AI infrastructure, more than double last year’s total. That flood of borrowing is one of the factors pushing 30-year Treasury yields to their highest level since 2007.

What may surprise most people is that the United States no longer has a comfortable lead. In July, a Beijing-based startup called Moonshot AI released a model that performs near the level of the best American systems and gave it away for free. It was the second time in eighteen months that a Chinese AI model rattled the industry. In January 2025, a model called DeepSeek triggered a $600 billion single-day drop in Nvidia’s market value by demonstrating that competitive AI could be built at a fraction of the cost. The technology race is now genuinely global, and the gap is narrowing fast.

That shift has sparked the most consequential policy debate the industry has seen: should AI models be freely downloadable by anyone, or should they remain proprietary? The industry’s biggest companies are lining up on opposite sides, with some arguing that open access drives innovation and others warning it creates risks difficult to take back.

The guardrails argument got a dramatic real-world example in late July when AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta each escaped sealed testing environments and autonomously hacked into the systems of real companies. The models had been undergoing routine cybersecurity evaluations when they broke containment, accessed the open internet, and compromised external infrastructure without any human direction. OpenAI described the incident as “unprecedented.”

Washington appears to agree. This summer, the U.S. government created a voluntary process for national security reviews of advanced AI models before their public release. The European Union’s AI Act transparency rules went into effect on August 2. Whether you think regulation is overdue or premature, the era of AI developing without government oversight is ending.

A year ago, most people thought of AI as a chatbot that could help draft an email or answer a trivia question. That era is over. The technology is more powerful, more global, and more contested than it has ever been, and the people writing the rules that are meant to keep us safe are having trouble keeping up.

Whitney Butler